From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `message' not outputting the newline "atomically" Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 16:28:26 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="141447"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2.90 (gnu/linux) Cc: Emacs developers To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 19 16:28:48 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hdbZv-000adI-Dh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 16:28:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38894 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hdbZu-0006qo-Fb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 10:28:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57419) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hdbZd-0006pP-MV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 10:28:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hdbZc-0002QR-Mv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 10:28:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:33056 helo=mx1.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hdbZc-0002OK-HJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 10:28:28 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Original-Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE498ACA7; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 14:28:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Yow: .. does your DRESSING ROOM have enough ASPARAGUS? In-Reply-To: (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 19 Jun 2019 16:12:47 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x (no timestamps) [generic] X-Received-From: 195.135.220.15 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:237898 Archived-At: On Jun 19 2019, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > When lines are output as a unit (and we're below OS-dependent block > sizes, I guess), we're guaranteed that two processes outputting lines > won't have them stomp on each other. Are we? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."