From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34776: Acknowledgement (27.0.50; Some questions about choose-completion-string-functions) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 10:05:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: <871s3jeh8m.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87zhq4zzcz.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <871s3a90qo.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87imvmbube.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="18342"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: eric@ericabrahamsen.net, 34776@debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 10 10:06:12 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hE8FH-0004bi-SX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 10:06:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55439 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hE8FG-0002sV-LA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:06:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49836) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hE8FA-0002re-G3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:06:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hE8F9-0002ys-El for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:06:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38827) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hE8F9-0002yk-9U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:06:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hE8F8-0002Uo-Qz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:06:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andreas Schwab Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 08:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34776 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34776-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34776.15548835129526 (code B ref 34776); Wed, 10 Apr 2019 08:06:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34776) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Apr 2019 08:05:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52371 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hE8EJ-0002Ta-Kn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:05:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:54190 helo=mx1.suse.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hE8EG-0002TF-TZ for 34776@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:05:09 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Original-Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F752B0BD; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 08:05:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Yow: MMM-MM!! So THIS is BIO-NEBULATION! In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 10 Apr 2019 07:33:14 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:157452 Archived-At: On Apr 10 2019, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Unfortunately, that ship has sailed, since within an hour of RC release a new commit was pushed to the release branch, and another one a week later, without asking. So now the RC tarball will not be able to be renamed anyway, and the rationale for withholding doc changes is null and void. Why not? Just tag the last commit that is contained in the rc release. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."