From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16808: 24.3.50; an error when completing M-x ... commands. Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:40:15 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87eh2zgxch.fsf@yahoo.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392810071 20880 80.91.229.3 (19 Feb 2014 11:41:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:41:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16808@debbugs.gnu.org To: Nicolas Richard Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 19 12:41:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WG5Wf-0007K1-45 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:41:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58325 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WG5We-0001mW-9d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 06:41:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35313) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WG5WW-0001mN-HY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 06:41:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WG5WR-0002KY-EU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 06:41:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58380) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WG5WR-0002KT-B8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 06:41:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WG5WQ-0000Mk-Ku for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 06:41:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andreas Schwab Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16808 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16808-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16808.13928100231351 (code B ref 16808); Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:41:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16808) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2014 11:40:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59562 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WG5Vl-0000Lh-Jp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 06:40:22 -0500 Original-Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:42130 helo=mx2.suse.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WG5Vg-0000LT-UB for 16808@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 06:40:17 -0500 Original-Received: from relay2.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0F0ACA4; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:40:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Yow: My haircut is totally traditional! In-Reply-To: <87eh2zgxch.fsf@yahoo.fr> (Nicolas Richard's message of "Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:23:26 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:85882 Archived-At: Nicolas Richard writes: > This is not from emacs -Q, but the patch seems obvious. If you want an > actual reproducible recipe, I can try to make one. > > Here's a diff : > > --- a/lisp/minibuffer.el > +++ b/lisp/minibuffer.el > @@ -1371,7 +1371,7 @@ appear to be a match." > (concat before ext after) > table predicate (1+ point) md)) > exts)))) > - (when (and (= 1 (length comps) (consp (car comps)))) > + (when (and (= 1 (length comps)) (consp (car comps))) (= 1 (length comps)) would be better written as (not (cdr comps)) in this context. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."