From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Indentation of cond forms in (Emacs) Lisp mode Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 09:37:56 +0200 Message-ID: References: <37BC56E1-3A18-46D0-8F56-F1447D18C02F@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1401953904 30697 80.91.229.3 (5 Jun 2014 07:38:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 07:38:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: "Bozhidar Batsov" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 05 09:38:14 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WsSFa-0002Wo-EA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 09:38:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38873 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WsSFa-0004yr-1K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 03:38:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56267) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WsSFR-0004xX-CH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 03:38:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WsSFK-0006Ya-Qa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 03:38:04 -0400 Original-Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:35993 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WsSFK-0006Xh-Jx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 03:37:58 -0400 Original-Received: from relay2.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9EA8AB0C; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 07:37:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Yow: Actually, what I'd like is a little toy spaceship!! In-Reply-To: <37BC56E1-3A18-46D0-8F56-F1447D18C02F@gmail.com> (Bozhidar Batsov's message of "Thu, 05 Jun 2014 10:07:39 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x (no timestamps) [generic] X-Received-From: 195.135.220.15 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:172357 Archived-At: "Bozhidar Batsov" writes: > Also, how is this any different from a macro like `with-temp-buffer`, > which has regular indentation (2 spaces)? This matches the generic pattern of (with-foo [sexp] [body]...), which is intented to be broken before [body]. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."