From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10539: 24.0.92; low display-time-interval makes Emacs slow Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:42:18 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87zkdl93r0.fsf@web.de> <6162fwu92z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83y5ssxlrx.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327779808 10343 80.91.229.3 (28 Jan 2012 19:43:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 19:43:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, 10539@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 28 20:43:27 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RrEBG-0004iD-8d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:43:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51880 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrEBF-0005Vd-Q2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:43:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42278) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrEBD-0005VM-3V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:43:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrEBC-0007rT-4h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:43:19 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43159) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrEBC-0007rP-3D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:43:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrEBu-0003z2-9z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:44:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 19:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10539 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10539-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10539.132777978815237 (code B ref 10539); Sat, 28 Jan 2012 19:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10539) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jan 2012 19:43:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48546 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrEB1-0003xh-DS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:43:08 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:49274 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrEAy-0003xa-AG for 10539@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:43:05 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrEAE-0006PB-Vf; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:42:18 -0500 X-Spook: MDA AGT. AMME Sears Tower South Africa Uzbekistan Qaddafi X-Ran: yM5$-/{@NDIJ:4\LP,CsMVk:iV;0T*`gNu#AmyotqmLaA2A3kas?z (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 28 Jan 2012 10:40:34 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56143 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Would the following wording make it less confusing/contradictory? > > Force next redisplay cycle to update the current buffer's mode line > and header line, based on the latest values of all the relevant > variables. Yes thanks. Plus something similar for the function's doc-string. So it doesn't actually "force redisplay", it just marks things to be updated the next time redisplay happens to occur (?).