From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15933: make check not working Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 19:36:05 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1384994229 7758 80.91.229.3 (21 Nov 2013 00:37:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 00:37:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15933@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andy Moreton Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 21 01:37:12 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VjIGa-0000lS-Sz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 01:37:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57822 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VjIGa-0004qH-E9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 19:37:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38238) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VjIGW-0004q1-5p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 19:37:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VjIGV-0005hQ-5V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 19:37:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49657) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VjIGV-0005hM-2g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 19:37:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VjIGU-0001mD-Hy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 19:37:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 00:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15933 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15933-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15933.13849941686761 (code B ref 15933); Thu, 21 Nov 2013 00:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15933) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Nov 2013 00:36:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35443 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VjIFc-0001ky-DD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 19:36:08 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:52329 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VjIFZ-0001kp-Q9 for 15933@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 19:36:06 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VjIFZ-0006jN-BN; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 19:36:05 -0500 X-Spook: Crypto AG spy halcon Rubin cybercash industrial espionage X-Ran: )b(@d--=n-)ryfq<1N]JSOm1k,II|'5jA^)B`<^,j>7Xv%#R)C;lWKU`nVe;ni06OI?f?. X-Hue: green X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Andy Moreton's message of "Wed, 20 Nov 2013 20:34:14 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:80817 Archived-At: Andy Moreton wrote: > The compile-main targets in test/automated/Makefile.in was originally > copied from lisp/Makefile.in (according to the comments). It seems that > it has not been updated to match the recent changes for msys path > translation and relative paths. I don't believe this analysis is correct. Assuming Eli's analysis was correct, this should be fixed now.