From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: make bootstrap on trunk fails Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 20:38:23 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4D6759D1.2040501@cs.ucla.edu> <4D677D17.4010605@cs.ucla.edu> <4D69771D.7010607@cs.ucla.edu> <4D6C44C3.9010402@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298943519 23992 80.91.229.12 (1 Mar 2011 01:38:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 01:38:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Noorul Islam , Emacs Development To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 01 02:38:34 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PuEXq-0007cN-Co for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 02:38:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47795 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PuEXp-0007gM-S0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 20:38:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41687 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PuEXh-0007fH-V2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 20:38:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PuEXg-0007Ee-Ow for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 20:38:25 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:46813) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PuEXg-0007EV-Fg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 20:38:24 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60214) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PuEXf-0001j6-NS; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 20:38:23 -0500 X-Spook: Security Council condor World Trade Center Bellcore X-Ran: oYelqS5J8*y{`6**c->iQ1(9/VUABh7GUEM$LenrB'}/~lj2g5e4Mex:$4hB;}CFfAs]N] X-Hue: yellow X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <4D6C44C3.9010402@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Mon, 28 Feb 2011 16:58:43 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:136629 Archived-At: Paul Eggert wrote: > Is it normal to commit configure.in without also committing > the corresponding changes to 'configure'? I may do that sometimes, yes, because I consider regenerating configure and committing it a PITA. I usually don't have the same version of autoconf as the last guy, and I dislike adding a large, meaningless chunk to the diff.