From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: mithraeum Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Performance degradation from long lines Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 07:47:56 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83o9bhp3rn.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: mithraeum NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1540539973 701 195.159.176.226 (26 Oct 2018 07:46:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 07:46:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 26 09:46:08 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gFwoq-00005r-Pd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 09:46:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58709 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gFwqx-0003P4-EZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 03:48:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50737) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gFwqo-0003Ok-0B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 03:48:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gFwqn-00081a-9a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 03:48:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-40133.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.133]:12656) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gFwqj-00080G-F7; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 03:48:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=default; t=1540540082; bh=JnMhfXqwFQlga5lm6Dzvy53eLyGMoms/Fta5rHlCBss=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From; b=PikvbxtPA00FSDT/LIwylPQGZoSRr8jWmETuzjSjaK3HedpyW9zUQJxSyc+BnWXNi gHFnFUqMp8ugd6veSwLpBRcvGK5WcbeT3E4/5nW61zkNBQUmu7vREJNNg0YbtCG/DM +2Vzxm9PpEOSc38A85PyTCQxbbt5gCCFL80O/LEc= In-Reply-To: <83o9bhp3rn.fsf@gnu.org> Feedback-ID: xC_oeWz6JH8P2gZn7Lj2b-XCGuoCWrP5vJcnJIBITi8jaWWW0Er_cElwenRnHDRr1t8z5iqR6bQTnK1M9VLMtg==:Ext:ProtonMail X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 185.70.40.133 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:230690 Archived-At: On Friday, October 26, 2018 12:26 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > In what major mode did that happen? I don't think I ever saw any > problems with 2000-character lines, it begins happening for me only > when lines are much longer, like tens of thousands of characters. It happened in python-mode. Also, I have to confess that I'm on an old, slow laptop. Perhaps you're seeing better performance simply because you have a more powerful system. > Also, what happens if you use switch to Fundamental mode in that case? It pasted in instantly. There was no slowdown of Emacs at all.