From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help
Subject: Re: Why is it not possible to use "nil" any more in init files ?
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 01:03:48 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <m9k9hj$7ug$1@dont-email.me>
References: <op.xpp8xurufjdmwo@tournesol>
	<mailman.14325.1416667223.1147.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
	<op.xpvtywrpfjdmwo@tournesol>
	<mailman.14534.1416923435.1147.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1421715941 14684 80.91.229.3 (20 Jan 2015 01:05:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 01:05:41 +0000 (UTC)
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 20 02:05:40 2015
Return-path: <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1YDNGF-00015w-LQ
	for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 02:05:39 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40403 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1YDNGE-0003zs-Mp
	for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:05:38 -0500
Original-Path: usenet.stanford.edu!news.kjsl.com!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help
Original-Lines: 24
Injection-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 01:03:48 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
	posting-host="457c4918966ac75337bd5bc691637b7b"; 
	logging-data="8144"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/u1IqswP4/urr5WjNv7miq"
User-Agent: XanaNews/1.18.1.6
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 150119-1, 01/19/2015), Outbound message
Cancel-Lock: sha1:uJvnIl/A6w2KHHfnKdgJby4cvNk=
Original-Xref: usenet.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:209886
X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor <help-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/help-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs>
List-Post: <mailto:help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:102165
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help/102165>

Phillip Lord wrote:

> I always used
> 
> (hated-mode 0)
> 
> which seems to be more intuitive than passing nil.

No, it doesn't.

We are not dealing with C or Forth.

In Lisp and Scheme, as a truth value, 2 is the same as
1 and the same as 0.  The only thing that is false is
nil (in Scheme, #f).

What if, to the most mindless of users,
2+2=5 seemed more "intuitive" than 2+2=4.

Should elisp be changed so that (+ 2 2) will yield
5?  Or should the mindless be required to learn to think?

Rewarding the mindless and penalizing the thoughtful is
a monstrous thing to do.