From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
Cc: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: usr1-signal, usr2-signal, etc.
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 10:48:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3zm9kb4im.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <wly7p4my35.wl%mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp> (YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu's message of "Tue\, 19 Dec 2006 11\:14\:06 +0900")
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp> writes:
>>>>>> On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:38:21 -0500, Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com> said:
>
>> storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes:
>>> So I would rather redefine them to single events (named sigusr1 and
>>> sigusr2 as those names are already known to the signal-process
>>> function), and handle them through special-event-map as you
>>> suggested.
>
>> In that case, is there a rationale for the rather large changes
>> checked into emacs.c, keyboard.c, and process.c over the last two
>> weeks? Should they not be reverted?
>
> Do the "large changes" you think should be reverted include my
> 2006-12-14 changes? These changes are not for the event format but
> for fixing a problem that has existed for a long time. That is, about
> calling a non-reentrant function in a signal handler context while it
> is executed in a normal context.
Yes. Those changes are very important on their own.
It still think that handling signals through special-event-map is
the proper (or the least problematic) thing to do. So unless I
hear any objections, I'll make that change later this week.
--
Kim F. Storm <storm@cua.dk> http://www.cua.dk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-19 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-03 1:39 usr1-signal, usr2-signal, etc Kim F. Storm
2006-12-04 5:15 ` Richard Stallman
2006-12-04 9:05 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-12-04 13:08 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-12-05 1:45 ` Richard Stallman
2006-12-05 3:40 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2006-12-05 22:26 ` David Kastrup
2006-12-05 22:51 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-12-08 10:28 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2006-12-11 9:41 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-12-11 14:31 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2006-12-12 9:47 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-12-12 13:32 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2006-12-12 13:54 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-12-13 9:38 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2006-12-13 10:26 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-12-14 9:14 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2006-12-14 11:23 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-12-18 16:38 ` Chong Yidong
2006-12-19 2:14 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2006-12-19 9:48 ` Kim F. Storm [this message]
2006-12-19 15:46 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-12-20 13:01 ` Richard Stallman
2006-12-20 15:58 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-12-12 21:46 ` Richard Stallman
2006-12-06 0:46 ` Richard Stallman
2006-12-06 9:44 ` Johan Bockgård
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3zm9kb4im.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk \
--to=storm@cua.dk \
--cc=cyd@stupidchicken.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.