From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10238: R in gnus-summary does not pop a frame like F does Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 06:01:04 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1325739704 23735 80.91.229.12 (5 Jan 2012 05:01:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 05:01:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10238@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 05 06:01:40 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RifSO-0001zQ-17 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 06:01:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43803 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RifSN-00038Z-Jq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:01:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51841) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RifSK-00037D-R7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:01:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RifSI-0000c7-8H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:01:36 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37321) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RifSI-0000c3-5J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:01:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RifVd-0005HE-Vr; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:05:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 05:05:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10238 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10238-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10238.132573988220256 (code B ref 10238); Thu, 05 Jan 2012 05:05:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10238) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jan 2012 05:04:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RifVJ-0005Gf-U4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:04:42 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RifVG-0005GX-TA for 10238@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:04:39 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RifRp-0002iM-12; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 06:01:05 +0100 X-Now-Playing: Various's _Dark Matter: Multiverse 2004 - 2009 (1)_: "Vex'd - Lion" In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 04 Jan 2012 20:26:38 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1RifRp-0002iM-12 MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1326344465.08744@0uJ+aPIrN5fYsYe/wykJ3Q X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:05:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:55404 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > I'm not completely sure ("emacs -Q" doesn't work too well with Gnus ;-), > but something like (setq special-display-regexps '("^\\*.*\\*$")) might > be sufficient. Yes, that allows me to reproduce the bug. I seem to recall the change here being made because a user had reported that `special-display-regexps' was being respected, and that the Gnus window conf wasn't. So just backing out the patch doesn't seem like the right thing to do, either... (But of course, `F' and `R' should behave the same way here, anyway...) Is there a way to have (setq special-display-regexps '("^\\*.*\\*$")) but still say "don't do this for the Message buffers? If so, the patch can be reverted, and the user who complained can just twiddle the variable in question... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/