From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 94, Issue 89 Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:30:09 +0200 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: <83zkv7rmpe.fsf@gnu.org> <83iq1us2hx.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285446676 30804 80.91.229.12 (25 Sep 2010 20:31:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 20:31:16 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 25 22:31:12 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OzbOo-00016E-Nv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:31:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49022 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OzbOl-00035N-Mt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 16:31:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54377 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OzbOf-00035C-9D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 16:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OzbOY-0003jp-PC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 16:30:59 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:37830) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OzbOY-0003jP-B8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 16:30:54 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OzbOW-00012r-7P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:30:52 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no ([84.215.34.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:30:52 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:30:52 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEWNgaScapXwp203CTfp zrDOkHDmnW2VN2+MToeOWIwvA/QeAAACSElEQVQ4jW2TsW7bMBCGaaRSnM0eDNSrEGsOoMHNGqgG utlGj2w2gzBvTpAydDcXGSpvNowg4tv2jpRUx+kvg+Ldd3fkkbK4KP6rvWhA/XKsqqIuWrsD/eJY 3Rbi9ngObi921ZeiuvmQcdEvpsX06eblHOyPjrX5AM4lGDw1xtSF4WlKqQxco82f8JLKBXDZugef NxGY9+Dnt4pESVZVFBbBhly/6+pUDDbNvK59nOzoR6Bx73ztva+r3c4Px4cDA0/Oir3eH3gYkhhQ KNtjIcQVTQYBDAPww0OY94b/JER/5w/NvHOW9BBozIHglEEZxaU6vxDwvexAryv6qTxRCwbv3eVd BCNozCwr764zlhAp5oBtYNaJwDXZ1x25Y2+OSGDNJQKZ6TY+ZzCLtUkK9Ekp3o2OGQqWJ0B8XYcS 63Jm5DoujwGAgDQPtllKQa+JkZoBIVghBeW0xCol4CyD3ly4XyIhkOlMgswMOhlK8efwtkeDGYzo MSBNBCkSoK/JSgMARslmV0kizYBKaVQgATQGfypaST1RFqxqOtGUMQ9gifNHC2BjoWxCu0rQJCup cbGgb/LRpQEkHIxAeYiAYPsPb6+xV/LPJcyFJPBs3OFB+BHqbDJh0KN1kMizc+PtVrwC5hktnM5p 6GkKgzdaHdDYRRL6gBFVQ+RGrOEzMwsh+KxkkiLSZWLOgA7sxyOF864SjWg4R1kqaFa9cds1HSBr 6NQyn6jtpYVVBJChNGiunHvO7z0oFy8q4e5Ihjq3qBT9m+/pWv8CU9ompS7MhmUAAAAASUVORK5C YII= Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Sun Ra & His Arkestra's _Nuclear War_: "Nuclear War " User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:C5FAztCVQiAzsbGJza757IxFng4= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130874 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > Ideally, we'd have two XINT-style macros, one that returns an int and > one that returns an EMACS_INT. E.g. for chars, we'd use the `int' > version since chars use less than 32 bits. Makes sense. The other macro could just be a wrapper around XINT that coerces to int. What would it be called? XIINT? Eek. Uhm. XNINT? (For "not long int.") :-) Ok, I have nothing. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen