From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: delete-process bug Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 16:29:12 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87k69eyddj.fsf@lrde.org> <87odxjakox.fsf@lrde.org> <8764jrlewm.fsf@lrde.org> <87pshyqgtd.fsf@lrde.org> <87fyiuq9t5.fsf@lrde.org> <877j45rj3w.fsf@lrde.org> <87k684y4uz.fsf@lrde.org> <87u0774rak.fsf@lrde.org> <8764jna6ll.fsf@lrde.org> <8764jlyn2c.fsf@lrde.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1149172321 27385 80.91.229.2 (1 Jun 2006 14:32:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 14:32:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Agustin Martin , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 01 16:31:58 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FloDC-0005QU-EZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 16:31:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FloDB-0008Ag-Uu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 10:31:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FloCy-00089o-RV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 10:31:32 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FloCw-000892-6v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 10:31:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FloCw-00088z-3t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 10:31:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.237] (helo=pfepc.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FloJC-0003Xn-7c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 10:37:58 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (unknown [80.165.4.124]) by pfepc.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id A116F8A0065; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 16:31:27 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: michael.cadilhac@lrde.org (=?utf-8?Q?Micha=C3=ABl?= Cadilhac) In-Reply-To: <8764jlyn2c.fsf@lrde.org> (=?utf-8?Q?Micha=C3=ABl?= Cadilhac's message of "Thu, 01 Jun 2006 16:20:43 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:55558 Archived-At: michael.cadilhac@lrde.org (Micha=C3=ABl Cadilhac) writes: > > Oh, and BTW, why is the wait_for_termination function not provided to > the user? Why? I think you can use accept-process-output in a loop to wait for the death of a specific process. --=20 Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk