From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: delete-process bug Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 23:42:22 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87k69eyddj.fsf@lrde.org> <87fyj0r41g.fsf@lrde.org> <20060524112846.GA12046@agmartin.aq.upm.es> <87bqtmjrsh.fsf_-_@lrde.org> <87odxjakox.fsf@lrde.org> <8764jrlewm.fsf@lrde.org> <87pshyqgtd.fsf@lrde.org> <87fyiuq9t5.fsf@lrde.org> <877j45rj3w.fsf@lrde.org> <87odxhq1ah.fsf@lrde.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1148939115 3651 80.91.229.2 (29 May 2006 21:45:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 21:45:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: agustin.martin@hispalinux.es, michael.cadilhac@lrde.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 29 23:45:11 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FkpXr-0001Fg-Lx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 23:45:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FkpXq-0002ci-W3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 17:45:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FkpXe-0002c0-6F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 17:44:50 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FkpXb-0002bo-9W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 17:44:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FkpXb-0002bl-6P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 17:44:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.237] (helo=pfepc.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FkpdD-0001AC-9I; Mon, 29 May 2006 17:50:35 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (0x503e2644.bynxx3.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.62.38.68]) by pfepc.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 776628A001C; Mon, 29 May 2006 23:44:37 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 29 May 2006 22:27:56 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:55456 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > ??? The Windows port already defines SIGCHLD (on src/s/ms-w32.h) and > uses that definition in w32proc.c, in the fragment I've shown and > elsewhere. > > Where did you see that defining SIGCHLD on Windows will do harm? If > it does, we already have that harm. My err! I didn't study the code well enough. I now understand that on MS-Windows, the SIGCHLD signal handler is still called on process termination, but not by the normal signal mechanism. So I'll shut up :-) -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk