From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Changing the default for `send-mail-function' Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 20:56:50 +0200 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: <87pqlztipk.fsf@gnu.org> <87sjqv19q2.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309203508 18936 80.91.229.12 (27 Jun 2011 19:38:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:38:28 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 27 21:38:24 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QbHdY-0001R1-4p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 21:38:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35120 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbHdW-0005Y8-Hg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:38:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55067) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbGze-00030Z-6h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 14:57:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbGzb-0000fD-VF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 14:57:09 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:43241) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbGzb-0000f2-BZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 14:57:07 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QbGzW-0006EO-PL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 20:57:02 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 20:57:02 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 20:57:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 20 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAGFBMVEUAAAChjVoBAQFDMycC AAHOxoILCAhxXkTZzIAkAAACaElEQVQ4jV1TTW/bMAzVlMC9TjNcXz2l8K5xhEn3NtjdCLRc06hQ rlOEhX9/j7Lz0RGB5PDxkRQ/hNxGlg/N8rJ9Fbg6IaQQL1uWV61x4AflLLIA2wnf6geguJhI7IaR Ts6AnrV6CnBn3LVairvMyhjlQ4S7vs/mKD7J7GvlnPkMdAXpgqP/APYWo3GUc7y7YUI00DpDJpGx D+YL/MW7esSwxpl7YiFzCNkbIiuis1dEmoPgB0QAFyhPBUGMKvLVaQAuH/B9eoyjReWQWGZdz/BE 0nxFa0xdjN2m2JZYUoZg7TCpKlOc89uFeKIhG0rrkr9lJ2BUSMsEVQdKhSFiAaJ4WguZB0enNlEX ryWRq+7HWvSudntTtynQLaXvl+GrNHQIrm4pNXl9fcKXkb5Vue0CZVKtWZ2vjPeWTPg7oiTW5dwt boxARMn7wzLkFlVfXG7lOAEYm8syGGOtqM43YJVNUs3uDVXc2PK6K0DDqNSYYya74XpcG7Igpbzy u0jJPovK9gi/5bmrKCnv/XMwhBgoTsgHywWswGj8iHaoTThUbLXbcSfwCV9jPTQewziMYPvfmhk/ kZT3ikCDecPAH81NHRRL61jjYUO0L12SQ6tUHlRxolIzZhSgbMNprxQya8bGg9nUxk5jIFZ711Kb GlUAWus4A4vkVCbMG+KSyphK7EyZivecaoPJRlpZXZConAAR6lSjtg7+ex4UXphSsWpwhZHUWWJy 5Q2Q2CaXeUs2/ce8e+KVvf0KDKCVtluKaV0BgLsEgEngBZlmHEDkQ77BesyuPcKPkAU44pDcd9Va XgCN0AjS/wPOV7KR8K9dBgAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Gang Gang Dance's _Eye Contact_: "Glass Jar" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:yKR0pK9VX2T7PJpN9wAJ/i5o728= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:141085 Archived-At: "Stephen J. Turnbull" writes: > Actually, this clearly fails to conform to the RFC. Well, so what? > Authentication is mandated because a submission agent must know the > identity of submitting entity, while the whole point of this > discussion is (more or less :-) that some users don't know their own > identities. We can use whatever protocol we want to submit bug reports. Whether we use SMTP, NNTP or HTTP, that up to us. And the result is the same: We get bug reports from users who don't know their own identities. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/