From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ignore mouse-wheel press during rotation Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 21:51:40 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1139172868 22881 80.91.229.2 (5 Feb 2006 20:54:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 20:54:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Drew Adams , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 05 21:54:26 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F5qto-0005Lt-6s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 21:54:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F5qx4-0007h2-JN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 15:57:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F5qvp-0007C4-Va for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 15:56:26 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F5qvn-0007Ad-RU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 15:56:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F5qvn-0007Aa-P9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 15:56:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.237] (helo=pfepc.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F5qvA-0004Bx-KT; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 15:55:44 -0500 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (0x503e2644.bynxx3.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.62.38.68]) by pfepc.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id C0035262878; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 21:52:33 +0100 (CET) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 05 Feb 2006 06:25:33 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:50056 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: "Drew Adams" >> Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 10:20:01 -0800 >> >> Question: Is it not the case that people only rarely intend to press (e.g. >> click, to paste) mouse-2 directly after using the wheel? > > I don't see why this should be rare. It's quite possible that a user > scrolls the buffer to find the correct place, then yanks some text in > that place. > >> If so, then shouldn't `mouse-wheel-inhibit-click-time' be (much) >> larger, by default? 5 minutes? 10 seconds? How much larger do you think is reasonable? Even 1 sec would be too much, IMO. > > I don't know. Kim, could you perhaps tell why you've chosen the > current default? I don't remember, but probably I thought that 1/3 sec was a good compromise between avoiding accidental yank vs. allowing user to yank after scroll. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk