From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Giles Chamberlin Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: multiline regex mode? Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:20:57 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1160996675 23659 80.91.229.2 (16 Oct 2006 11:04:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:04:35 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 16 13:04:34 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GZQGm-0006cq-HB for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:04:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GZQGm-0003FH-1N for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 07:04:32 -0400 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.gamma.ru!Gamma.RU!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.icl.net!skynet.be!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Trace: individual.net p7z8k3WHEYCkHen8jAEtggmrLQzeVmYSAJgZCeqfvskqSjCA2r User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:L9ZBS2qVrfkwJRmM3u/yS2fWBOs= Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:142448 Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:38069 Archived-At: [snip] regex to match {foo} and {\nfoo\n} Dieter Wilhelm writes: > Does this (between the "") > > "{[^}]*}" > > work for you? That works but I' don't understand why given that {.*} fails. Any enlightenment gratefully received! -- Giles