From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [DIFFS] Re: Connection to emacs CVS broken ? Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:14:35 +0100 Message-ID: References: <17913.45372.941749.353301@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <45F9C5E8.1010700@gnu.org> <87ps7am73r.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <17913.59348.720489.675967@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <87y7lxde4n.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87odmt42ar.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1174061659 15935 80.91.229.12 (16 Mar 2007 16:14:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:14:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 16 17:14:12 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HSF4E-0004x8-Ew for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:14:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HSF5M-0001Vv-3h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:15:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HSF52-00018r-Pk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:15:00 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HSF4z-00015p-QN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:14:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HSF4z-00015M-J9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:14:57 -0500 Original-Received: from pfepa.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.235]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HSF3r-0006Gz-0E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:13:47 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (unknown [80.165.4.124]) by pfepa.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D3B5FAC042; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:13:37 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87odmt42ar.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Fri\, 16 Mar 2007 11\:48\:44 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.95 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:68007 Archived-At: Chong Yidong writes: > storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes: > >> Both NIIMI Satoshi and Guanpeng Xu alias Herbert Euler have a fully >> rsync repository from 2007-03-13. >> >> So what if we get both of these, and compare them. > > Wouldn't it be easier to just check this in by hand? We don't have to > do a mass commit, since Richard objects, but checking the patches in > individually won't be such a chore. From looking at the diffs you > generated, there are only 16 separate major sets of changes to the > code and manuals (plus a few more minor changes to auxilliary files). > It would take at most an hour for someone to check these in with the > appropriate CVS logs. > > I volunteer do this if we decide it's a good idea. > lisp/ChangeLog > 2007-03-13 Chong Yidong comint.el > 2007-03-12 Kim F. Storm ido.el > 2007-03-12 Lawrence Mitchell (tiny change) tempo.el > 2007-03-12 Carsten Dominik textmodes/org.el > 2007-03-12 Mark A. Hershberger xml.el eshell/esh-mode.el > 2007-03-12 Glenn Morris calc/calc-forms.el woman.el startup.el > > man/ChangeLog > 2007-03-12 Glenn Morris calc.texi calendar.texi > 2007-03-11 Andreas Seltenreich gnus.texi > > src/ChangeLog > 2007-03-12 Andreas Schwab lisp.h process.c > 2007-03-12 Kim F. Storm process.c keyboard.c That list is not complete (ref the DIFFS I posted). At least RMS updated dired.c. Also, it only covers the trunk. By installing the most recent rsync tar-ball, we would get the branches up-to-date as well. It probably wouldn't take more than 1 hour to compare two very similar rsync tarballs either. So if you could get the two rsync tar-balls, compare and validate them, and send the "best one" to the Savannah people, it would be time well spent. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk