From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Testing the gnutls support Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 22:26:53 +0200 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: <87r5g0x0fd.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83mxqnmqqy.fsf@gnu.org> <8762xalkgg.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ipv3krh1.fsf@lifelogs.com> <871v1m6nu8.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87liztwx36.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301776040 2821 80.91.229.12 (2 Apr 2011 20:27:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 20:27:20 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 02 22:27:16 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q67Pf-0002Vu-1n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 22:27:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51079 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q67Pe-0004IE-Hb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 16:27:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38879 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q67PZ-0004I8-CY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 16:27:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q67PY-0008Ui-4z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 16:27:09 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:46427) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q67PX-0008Ub-Pu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 16:27:08 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q67PU-0002Rz-5r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 22:27:04 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 22:27:04 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 22:27:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAD1BMVEUbFxchHR4MCQkUEBBV UlJjwIk7AAACMklEQVQ4jXWUbZarIAyGQVwAARagSRdAiAuo0+5/TfcNOp25P8bznmrz5IMQNLz/ uAJRSDavSESJOWZms0cINnA3ljjNEgaLWV9xx78hnSjjsYN1T3EE9ut2Zxvi1h5CczBgd3f4htRR lTJqwA1pphkYRgqGPwCmM0t3G+VZkzk8gkVkkRkf0mWl0ekRaJmlc7LLqkOIN4DhOcJt3rEOGEYC iIQe7eqGDwdGbABudufBe5FjbOuQxtYelxnWL9ayrQtAb5B3Lry/WF+iRQDa0tsSHOwn708H65e0 srXSna2BHycfTz5+g9LfLQjACj339qXvou9KrhbsOKWdm8sj+pR+gLSntJe8y+ZBJTromXvlUCWW LS5bHJui+QOT9a7xU2xfbMcQMAixdY6cubq2gi1kxUaidY8gGVV71pqVSt6tPqx4RNEtZQ2kmSJV 0lQPq8cEO0B3FuM3WP8DeYIK8GofYFm1Rq20/0TQ3iusDmLNMVVK1SM64dhiwFCawoO20JM6MPqR g3ewpG3RNiIxRKdMdaQybZVaJrwRrkinQg62Y+k+abaT08nBIzYHOBuYv91AIoQZOJgHA6cpTZAn WC+AU9npTvUBwvEGHoGFPfkG13EFCGAkOQvlH8DfgC+A4oIxK7FOABF9AHnbOjv/BYaov3pp7mPA EE/M8YwA8EWENFrc9zTfq7xhExk1emSNd42UfWFzrxw481ayK/hy8cp2EZNu+F5YT6nXkhJG+9dn 6R8VbZGvvyRo0gAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Wire's _Red Barked Tree_: "Bad Worn Thing" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110016 (No Gnus v0.16) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:s22L8f5TKQWHlLqXLUtKtaoDo4A= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:138071 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > Yes, because another invalid certificate presented by the same host > shouldn't be automatically accepted. Well, one could store a SHA1 of the certificate or something, but I guess that doesn't make much of a difference... > Are you OK with the rest of the flow? I can add at least the > defcustoms and UI necessary to the GnuTLS patch, and maybe add the > proto-stream.el glue. Yes, sounds to me. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggery blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/