From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [RFC] automatically retrying network connections Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2018 15:41:31 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87sh4dfz8r.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1532266814 15461 195.159.176.226 (22 Jul 2018 13:40:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2018 13:40:14 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Emacs developers To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 22 15:40:10 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fhEan-0003ug-Uj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2018 15:40:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56050 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fhEct-0005EU-5r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2018 09:42:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44637) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fhEcE-0005EO-PA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2018 09:41:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fhEcB-0004bp-MM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2018 09:41:38 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:58553) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fhEcB-0004bE-FM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2018 09:41:35 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.221.165.getinternet.no ([84.212.221.165] helo=stories) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fhEc7-0007zM-GX; Sun, 22 Jul 2018 15:41:33 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAMFBMVEWcBQ+cLEeOAQGvzu2w AACtAADJEDa7AAC0CR29AABWhdCOAwa3AABHb8GxAACdAABereY7AAABz0lEQVQ4ja2UsUoDQRCG rxUbDyGagBZXCRYi2y2ks7HRylYQ4fB8Au0MiHCFRQjEWzFFCFgMLIjtPUCaFKbTxelsBMkzOLO7 dyaXiI1T3A3z3czOzj9JkDt7yltXAVv+ZF/LQeRJ/hxF7G/nkXWCaPu5CM9YYJ9zYQZb8QL7EyjV LWPsKgY7qrDuWenOgimzoB2GQjQRx+sVcA8DIQQAaKXiWpz8AI4z0aq7qkON9QLYuJAEziXwOy0z JIAt1QAptIE3B3oUAiQbq4ZhHx5LsHI9tM00AIXkL3xXet93uYFmQGV1akEHsASgwwFA32V0ZJnR MrX4xIxrHohmyEYgW6fr8Uw9kAhC4/iyMhLqioYiNb66GcfpD7A312hBXJZqoxuW5CFZxZIpPS5a BN58RjIj1Cngi3WyioI9oFHMSUvntXEe8IFphtivArs2d0bsLgJJtgBQqZTP6PM3aTepdIXU7o3f RnfzugW3iO/Kr2niZoVrLAWJXs88cAr2DKLRvA1LPsOPhIobQXoU96PdvvOAd1QC1stuHcjMwC7i i6oAlTV4LzfVHCA1wuBzKq4efvvh/ApsqehhOByNJpOvET+PJwcfe0eHxR/AAvtH8A2CVPdeFYG7 pAAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== In-Reply-To: (Noam Postavsky's message of "Sun, 22 Jul 2018 09:37:10 -0400") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:227666 Archived-At: Noam Postavsky writes: > Maybe because NSM currently does very few checks by default, and so is > rarely triggered at all (i.e., the reason this whole thread started in > the first place)? Well, it does certificate checks, which in practice will represent 99.7% of all user interactions. The TLS protocol checks check for things that barely exist in real life. (Except as test suites and at villainous sites, and it's the latter we want to protect against.) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no