From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; Emacs should survive a lost X connection Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:09:25 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20080208.195113.190255739.hanche@math.ntnu.no> <20080210.200457.117523959.hanche@math.ntnu.no> <20080210.204412.99599742.hanche@math.ntnu.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202681407 30481 80.91.229.12 (10 Feb 2008 22:10:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:10:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org To: Harald Hanche-Olsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 10 23:10:29 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JOKNU-0005US-MD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:10:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JOKN1-0002na-73 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:09:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JOKMw-0002nB-8s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:09:50 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JOKMu-0002mL-GH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:09:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JOKMu-0002mI-A5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:09:48 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JOKMu-0001ax-46 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:09:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JOKMt-0005xM-Qc for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:09:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JOKMq-0001a3-Li for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:09:47 -0500 Original-Received: from ppsw-0.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.130]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JOKMq-0001Zh-CB; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:09:44 -0500 X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Original-Received: from sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.223.202]:38947) by ppsw-0.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.150]:587) with esmtpsa (LOGIN:sl392) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1JOKMo-0001zX-0W (Exim 4.67) (return-path ); Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:09:42 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20080210.204412.99599742.hanche@math.ntnu.no> (Harald Hanche-Olsen's message of "Sun, 10 Feb 2008 20:44:12 +0100 (CET)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130000 Emacs/23.0.60 (20080208) Fedora 8 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:88673 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:20996 Archived-At: On 2008-02-10 19:44 +0000, Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote: > + Richard Stallman : > >> In any case, I think the following fix is called for. It reenables >> the automatic clearing of x error catching, whose validity is assured >> by the error check that I reenabled. Does this give you correct >> behavior? > > I need to be in my office to test this, so it will have to wait until > tomorrow. I'll get back with an answer then. > > As for the breakpoint you wanted me to try, I will try it, but as I > have gotten different behaviours when running under gdb it's not clear > that it will accomplish anything. > > - Harald With CVS 20080210 I am still seeing a bug that can be reproduced this way: 1. emacs -q -nw -f server-start 2. emacsclient -c ;; open a X frame 3. C-x 5 0 to close the X frame 4. Try `emacsclient -c' a second time 5. Fatal error ,---- | Waiting for Emacs... | *ERROR*: Arithmetic error `---- HTH, -- .: Leo :. [ sdl.web AT gmail.com ] .: [ GPG Key: 9283AA3F ] :. Use the best OS -- http://www.fedoraproject.org/