From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Locks on the Bzr repository Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:33:31 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4C6D56DB.7040703@swipnet.se> <4C6D8EC5.7040901@swipnet.se> <4C6E1F0A.7070506@swipnet.se> <837hjlr78p.fsf@gnu.org> <87zkwhtws5.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83tymppj62.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1282311227 21151 80.91.229.12 (20 Aug 2010 13:33:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Stephen J. Turnbull" , jan.h.d@swipnet.se, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 20 15:33:45 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OmRj4-0006yy-SF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:33:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55646 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OmRj3-0001gg-Rw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:33:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51326 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OmRiy-0001gR-Dx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:33:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OmRix-0002MZ-AX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:33:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:50863) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OmRiv-0002MF-TQ; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:33:34 -0400 Original-Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A4431C00573; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:33:32 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from hase.home (ppp-88-217-127-212.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.127.212]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 252DD1C0034B; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:33:32 +0200 (CEST) X-Yow: Youth of today! Join me in a mass rally for traditional mental attitudes! In-Reply-To: <83tymppj62.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:23:17 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128922 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > With the rate of commits to the Emacs repository, the chances that > someone "sneaks in a commit before you start your push" are 100%. Is it? I almost never have that problem. Moreover, this has nothing to do with bound vs. unbound, since you are racing with other commiters in any case. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."