From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jesper Harder Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: UUIDGEN in lisp Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:21:07 +0100 Organization: http://purl.org/harder/ Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1077053609 32086 80.91.224.253 (17 Feb 2004 21:33:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 21:33:29 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 17 22:33:19 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AtCqF-0001zz-00 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:33:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AtCp3-0005LZ-Le for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:32:05 -0500 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!news2.telebyte.nl!news.tele.dk!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help X-Face: ^RrvqCr7c,P$zTR:QED"@h9+BTm-"fjZJJ-3=OU7.)i/K]<.J88}s>'Z_$r; List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:16955 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:16955 "Eli Zaretskii" writes: >> What is the difference between `raw-text-unix' and `binary'? In which >> cases should you use one or the other? > > I suggest to use raw-text-unix when doing I/O of random bytes that you > don't want to be mangled. no-conversion (binary is just its alias) > once meant that the internal Mule representation was read and written > to produce multibyte characters, so I suggest to avoid that to prevent > confusion. So you're saying that `raw-text-unix' and `binary' are completely equivalent today, right?