From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Percent sign in message Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:26:15 +0200 Message-ID: References: <200609110657.k8B6vTHW021987@ushabti.sfbay.sun.com> <85mz96c1m9.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1157963307 20785 80.91.229.2 (11 Sep 2006 08:28:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 08:28:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Whitfield Diffie , =?utf-8?Q?Micha=C3=ABl?= Cadilhac , emacs-devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 11 10:28:25 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GMh9U-0004Q6-7S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:28:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GMh9T-0000I0-4v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 04:28:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GMh8W-0000C5-Lx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 04:27:24 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GMh8U-0000AT-8s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 04:27:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GMh8T-00009v-JK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 04:27:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.235] (helo=pfepa.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GMh9f-0001wZ-VS; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 04:28:36 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (unknown [80.165.4.124]) by pfepa.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 559EEFAC02C; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:27:18 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: David Kastrup In-Reply-To: <85mz96c1m9.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Mon\, 11 Sep 2006 09\:18\:38 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:59664 Archived-At: David Kastrup writes: >>> Why don't you use (message "%s" whatever)? >> > Well, we have had enough "idiots" asking this question by now that it > would not seem amiss to mention this idiom in DOC-string and/or Elisp > manual entry. It does not seem immediately obvious. Done. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk