From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 17:57:34 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87wrefhaaf.fsf@jidanni.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1315757280 15216 80.91.229.12 (11 Sep 2011 16:08:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:08:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jidanni@jidanni.org, 9301@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 11 18:07:55 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2mZX-0004pb-KW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 18:07:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50724 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2mZX-0004OX-4I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 12:07:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:40645) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2mZS-0004Fn-Ks for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 12:07:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2mZP-0005IN-GT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 12:07:50 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58172) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2mZP-0005IJ-De for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 12:07:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2mdX-0005bP-IJ; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 12:12:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:12:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9301 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 9301-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9301.131575751321496 (code B ref 9301); Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:12:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9301) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2011 16:11:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2mdL-0005ad-WD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 12:11:53 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2mdJ-0005aK-3A for 9301@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 12:11:50 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R2mZ3-0001VK-LH; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 18:07:25 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Sun, 11 Sep 2011 17:50:45 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEVFAQVKQ0q1rbPr5+og Gh9mX2c4LzYeCg8cFRoZExdEPkQYEBVObJmEAAACZUlEQVQ4jW3Uv2vbQBQH8BuC2zEHiTG35YyW bpHoHsPVVZulNtwegiuDunSKBy8tHERq10J00RKRYBJlK0kc9f1zfe9OEvTH2/w+9+4r+85iRmVY cfZ3sX86PdR9bWa8K/EH3B30sIfAe1i+7uEeoaqF8HAR9XBMIDivKopYRV2IAINAfZIRRIddBCgP SLxaQtSF3LfAheCCf4eoCzkmSLEnsIbbddSGCChboJkR4IQP2WtyhKTyq5YrBB9yV2QI05raXJwT +JB3WUyQug9D2BJQiCiMQlAJjfDRak1w6H4oRWAc1J/WFO5Cbo2HaVrjFz8GByFCrBzQXhXfgAcM ETiwQHhWSVqLG+yXBAd8T6nEgZkmKb8tG1uOIykDfqOmSYLQmCM2qF+usBhj8lW1VImHAuHkBWMO 9FV6dNbBFzZgVIjsA0vYwAPYi887PewyxRgCniDAdrWz62cY27BzB8rDmd6/GpwQLN5i0sBDCfBV z7UWC62HSmXv66SHj1oHerbRs0Uc4znUbQaA1lri8v0h3XDFxcZnwANBoEV6E1uUStQtPCLMpZ5N F/kzwoTXGw9vHAQzFZcE33AvD9qDNjnQX8Nw7uGJQEupbekA76CHRx0Ecz2WQQNNVtgcQ4SD07mk CgMAjLC2uGzB92UkAQoqa/B4WbZ9ki2ECJklqThNPLYwDqHJrasJwfa0gwga187tJY9ZtpZdOQB8 KvuD4Ckc03IHuBytsGWF8DOMxlh0p8CWZdMg5BPMuA6jyPcRGsD7VeT5L5wYy1C2m0Fb1j7E/iWD l9gY1b+CjDLxf94+MUIc/wYlC6YCrvIGEQAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: Ikonika's _Contact, Love, Want, Have_: "Video Delays" X-MailScanner-ID: 1R2mZ3-0001VK-LH MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1316362045.74056@rcWWh8Irk/NmMD0wExk1mA X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 12:12:03 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:50905 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab writes: > Exactly. Saying "(must include -l)" is simple and clear, and fully > correct. No, because it doesn't have to include -l. -o and -g does not imply -l. It's kinda like -l, though. So "(must include -l or similar)" might be best... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/