From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GnuTLS C support for nsm.el Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:19:41 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87twbd3oww.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1479165764 14181 195.159.176.226 (14 Nov 2016 23:22:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:22:44 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 15 00:22:38 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c6QZs-0000I2-V9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:22:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43133 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6QZu-0003UA-9Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:22:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51761) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6QXV-0002PN-Gf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:19:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6QXQ-0007ww-LN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:19:49 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:41779) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6QXQ-0007wb-Fd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:19:44 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.1.64.getinternet.no ([84.215.1.64] helo=stories) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c6QXN-0000oA-NZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:19:43 +0100 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAElBMVEVFOASNhAv//w3PyhD9 /A7//wyoF9qdAAACKElEQVQ4jW2TS5LjIAyGpcDsUfDs08TswdB7sJ0LMMX9rzISjtOd6RGVmNLH rxc2rPtpbn7tnJuhzf/4nROwg5tStWmrd9rsWmtMH+sBVkXGhBDvaMxSKNBteSoAVTWGZn5cixbg TgWGiGpFE66iCNaN5G6KFTc7rbai5Ij0BHPNO2QzBSxJwWS0paei6B1R4gVSiJqCtgcgtQNcg/ow oACvoVykKgcz4I4KFddsLG/YrO+NwbTtlGPe7JYSLTFPKUv74JRSxEEMFIi8lEaNoAcAGrlNJDKZ 3Yi/cICjKDABIeyouYSLAMNiCWUKkImggU+OUDXnHJdYOXVK6+a2/bHvTRSmaglCLFLSget9lKu3 gsFisVTKG1A1mITRZAZjfkIkVEAKRkFQthQUr/MscdAoEbdOy5TiRDZTulp6COB+yPKwlOWr4ouS vj4ZOAZmIc3dX+ZbNY6bMgdIUK0aFkoNiZX0uze+2jsH5hWnaD+2NHJ8CqCKYTLLzDWv3vvWD4NW 5E7t5a4wLC+3gBsPjydv4Rpdc1+g33ZFKmy5RHz0/g3ct2VbUvPpT3oHYzrecVrX30A7Bud9l3Va g969+Jsfm+HkM9x5bwPwvn0rdij6yCHPd3Ao5B54jSz+HTjfhvQIyzm6O609f88b/ALDy39PcAY6 I7Z2hHqBUzKSy1tyjuSMN7ofCn8ALra1c14CPI/jONX71xilqh/GX5q8JT/BoXj819/cX5zEzepB VZwsAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC In-Reply-To: <87twbd3oww.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Fri, 11 Nov 2016 12:30:07 -0500") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209405 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > The UI is similar to the typical SSH hostkey acceptance. By default > these use ~/.gnutls/known_hosts but Emacs could override the backend > storage function to use the ~/.emacs.d/network-security.data file. > > I am neutral about this, but wanted to bring it up for discussion. Does > anyone think this GnuTLS facility is valuable enough to start using it, > or should we keep nsm.el the way it is, Emacs Lisp only? Lars? I think it would be confusing to put some of this functionality in GnuTLS-specific files and some in NSM-specific files, from a user's point of view. And since NSM has more functionality, I think it wins. :-) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no