From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs pretest bug reports Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:31:12 +0100 Message-ID: References: <45EE65E4.8020604@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1173263444 11278 80.91.229.12 (7 Mar 2007 10:30:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 10:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Drew Adams , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jan =?utf-8?Q?Dj=C3=A4rv?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 07 11:30:35 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HOtPm-0006Vj-5t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:30:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HOtPr-0001yJ-3T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 05:30:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HOtPg-0001yA-D9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 05:30:28 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HOtPd-0001xq-R4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 05:30:27 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HOtPd-0001xn-MS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 05:30:25 -0500 Original-Received: from pfepc.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.237]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HOtPY-0004pn-5O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 05:30:20 -0500 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (unknown [80.165.4.124]) by pfepc.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 9829B8A0082; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 11:30:16 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <45EE65E4.8020604@swipnet.se> ("Jan =?utf-8?Q?Dj=C3=A4rv=22's?= message of "Wed\, 07 Mar 2007 08\:12\:36 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.95 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67492 Archived-At: Jan Dj=C3=A4rv writes: > I think having two lists is redundant, we need only one. Agree. It also makes it easier to search for bug reports - since many bugs are already reported directly to emacs-devel, or the discussions about them are split across the two lists. --=20 Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk