Wouldn't that be needed?

Wouldn't that be needed?

[David Kastrup]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 125 bytes --]


When looking for some problem, I hit upon the following (probably
unrelated) which appears to be appropriate in gtkutil.c:


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/x-patch, Size: 254 bytes --]

--- gtkutil.c	04 Feb 2005 02:04:31 +0100	1.61
+++ gtkutil.c	21 Feb 2005 02:30:55 +0100	
@@ -719,6 +719,8 @@
       if (wvbox) gtk_widget_destroy (wvbox);
       if (wfixed) gtk_widget_destroy (wfixed);
 
+      UNBLOCK_INPUT;
+
       return 0;
     }
 

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 52 bytes --]



-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum

[-- Attachment #4: Type: text/plain, Size: 142 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel

Re: Wouldn't that be needed?

[Kim F. Storm]

David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:

> When looking for some problem, I hit upon the following (probably
> unrelated) which appears to be appropriate in gtkutil.c:
>
>
> --- gtkutil.c	04 Feb 2005 02:04:31 +0100	1.61
> +++ gtkutil.c	21 Feb 2005 02:30:55 +0100	
> @@ -719,6 +719,8 @@
>        if (wvbox) gtk_widget_destroy (wvbox);
>        if (wfixed) gtk_widget_destroy (wfixed);
>  
> +      UNBLOCK_INPUT;
> +
>        return 0;
>      }
>  

Installed.  Thanks.

-- 
Kim F. Storm <storm@cua.dk> http://www.cua.dk