From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan... Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 13:57:55 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1109855321 29391 80.91.229.2 (3 Mar 2005 13:08:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 13:08:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 03 14:08:40 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D6pxj-00045P-62 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 14:01:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D6qGg-0005Ff-Pa for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 08:21:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D6qGB-000558-2z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 08:20:59 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D6qG1-00050g-7Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 08:20:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D6qG1-000500-1D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 08:20:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [212.88.64.25] (helo=mail-relay.sonofon.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D6q0F-0004r6-0l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 08:04:31 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 29693 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2005 12:57:49 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk) (213.83.150.2) by 0 with SMTP; 3 Mar 2005 12:57:49 -0000 Original-To: snogglethorpe@gmail.com In-Reply-To: (Miles Bader's message of "Thu, 3 Mar 2005 08:58:08 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:34137 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:34137 Miles Bader writes: > On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:10:35 +0100, Kim F. Storm wrote: >> Miles Bader writes: >> >> > I think an explicit decision should be made one way or the other. >> >> Based on the fact that _I_ don't have the necessary time to debug more >> silly xasserts, _I_ made the explicit decision to disable them. > > So you're gonna go the "childish commit wars" route? Childish or not, I don't have time for a) discussing this issue further b) debugging more of those "silly asserts". > You're a good hacker in many ways Kim, but this is just stupid. I agree. > The > Emacs hacker community is generally above that sort of thing (unlike > many other projects); please let's keep it that way. Sure. In any case, the change I made allows you to easily turn on asserts, e.g.: /configure CFLAGS="-g -O0 -DXASSERTS=1" If somebody would refine that to /configure --with-asserts it would be great!! -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk