From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Tromey Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RFC: status icon support Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:17:05 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20080115.064048.07606749.mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp> Reply-To: Tom Tromey NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1200448340 23920 80.91.229.12 (16 Jan 2008 01:52:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 01:52:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 16 02:52:43 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JExSM-0006pX-Kq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:52:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JExRx-0002xX-6v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:52:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JExR3-0002M8-FF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:51:21 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JExQz-0002It-Qz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:51:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JExQz-0002In-H7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:51:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JExQy-0001p6-OH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:51:17 -0500 Original-Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0G1pEtb024965; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:51:14 -0500 Original-Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m0G1pDZW016556; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:51:13 -0500 Original-Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ton.yyz.redhat.com [10.15.16.15]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m0G1pCSA003439; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:51:12 -0500 Original-Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id C92C25089A4; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:17:05 -0700 (MST) X-Attribution: Tom In-Reply-To: <20080115.064048.07606749.mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp> (YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu's message of "Tue\, 15 Jan 2008 06\:40\:48 +0900 \(JST\)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.990 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.52.254 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:86955 Archived-At: >>>>> ">" == YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu writes: >> A tool bar is represented as a keymap. If status icons are similar to >> tool bar icons (application-level as opposed to frame-level), the use >> of the keymap data structure looks more consistent to me. Thanks for responding. I've been thinking about this a bit, and I don't understand the benefits of this versus just using a simple cons. (I do understand, I think, why you would prefer not to make a new type.) Also, I do not know how to implement this. Tom