From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A git repository question Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:01:18 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20091007.174517.110447638.hanche@math.ntnu.no> <87skdubst5.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <20091007.211609.103320593.hanche@math.ntnu.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1254992549 10271 80.91.229.12 (8 Oct 2009 09:02:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 09:02:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Harald Hanche-Olsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 08 11:02:21 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Mvosy-0005Yf-Ts for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:02:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58880 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mvosy-00061n-8z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 05:02:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MvosT-0005r2-Dq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 05:01:37 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MvosN-0005oy-SY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 05:01:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47562 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MvosN-0005ou-Jt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 05:01:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:11962) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MvosN-0004WD-0K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 05:01:31 -0400 Original-Received: from int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9891Lpu028300; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 05:01:21 -0400 Original-Received: from hase.home (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9891IDB023105; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 05:01:19 -0400 X-Yow: Jesus is my POSTMASTER GENERAL.. In-Reply-To: <20091007.211609.103320593.hanche@math.ntnu.no> (Harald Hanche-Olsen's message of "Wed, 07 Oct 2009 21:16:09 -0400 (EDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.16 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:115981 Archived-At: Harald Hanche-Olsen writes: > That answers my last question, thank you. But then the lack of this > tag in the git repository is a shortcoming in the cvs-to-git > conversion process, no? When cvsps cannot find a changeset corresponding to a CVS tag it usually means that the tag wasn't set in a consistent way (based on commit time). In the case of the EMACS_23_1 tag I don't know why it didn't work. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."