From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: James Cloos Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: delete-selection-mode Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:06:41 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1272565104 8432 80.91.229.12 (29 Apr 2010 18:18:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 18:18:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 29 20:18:22 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7YJY-0008TA-Mq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 20:18:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53275 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O7YJX-0005Pu-W2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:18:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O7YJT-0005Pp-Tx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:18:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60390 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O7YJM-0005Ph-Sr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:18:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7YJL-0003d2-5p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:18:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eagle.jhcloos.com ([207.210.242.212]:50539) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7YJL-0003cW-2j; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:18:07 -0400 Original-Received: by eagle.jhcloos.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 267B640161; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 18:17:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jhcloos.com; s=eagle; t=1272565085; bh=nCpJtac6PxP3bEWXLEkwkwiSBPjIwubjLyECiNsztq8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=iR5+cfE6cVbr98HoNh6dLDH4SosF3aKyn678nDe+q51JjQK/B1lvSqr6ogznMFglU ovFtCAzcQtSfHJTutMWVv63/IHiqPDqyp7vWCeJOv1v54hgBMB5c8gJ1hXEOhKSJRK efU6HYCSsnxKhcZOjV0XLmSr0KZ/cjhOh8n0fMlE= Original-Received: from lugabout.jhcloos.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lugabout.jhcloos.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D9CA0083; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 18:07:06 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:32:28 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAABAAAAAQCAYAAAAf8/9hAAAABHNCSVQICAgIfAhkiAAAAI1J REFUOE+lU9ESgCAIg64P1y+ngUdxhl5H8wFbbM0OmUiEhKkCYaZThXCo6KE5sCbA1DDX3genvO4d eBQgEMaM5qy6uWk4SfBYfdu9jvBN9nSVDOKRtwb+I3epboOsOX5pZbJNsBJFvmQQ05YMfieIBnYX FK2N6dOawd97r/e8RjkTLzmMsiVgrAoEugtviCM3v2WzjgAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== Copyright: Copyright 2009 James Cloos OpenPGP: ED7DAEA6; url=http://jhcloos.com/public_key/0xED7DAEA6.asc OpenPGP-Fingerprint: E9E9 F828 61A4 6EA9 0F2B 63E7 997A 9F17 ED7D AEA6 Original-Lines: 21 X-Hashcash: 1:30:100429:monnier@iro.umontreal.ca::rs8kjuThCa4zTFEs:000000000000000000000000000000000000wdX+v X-Hashcash: 1:30:100429:rms@gnu.org::KlExDviJFIrV+p0y:00000MUCht X-Hashcash: 1:30:100429:emacs-devel@gnu.org::QHCACJW1sGOr4STj:000000000000000000000000000000000000000002abXU X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:124325 Archived-At: >>>>> "SM" == Stefan Monnier writes: SM> I'd like to make the DEL part default (i.e. hitting DEL when the SM> selection is active deletes the selection), With the ability to yank it back, or without? The ability to delete text w/o any way to recover it would be a disaster. And I haven't been able to deduce the answer to that question from the various posts on the various threads which I've read. If the deleted text /can/ be yanked back, then your proposal is welcome. (Even though I used the work yank, recovery via (undo) also would do.) -JimC -- James Cloos OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6