From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 94, Issue 89 Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 21:41:24 +0200 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: <83zkv7rmpe.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285357315 25375 80.91.229.12 (24 Sep 2010 19:41:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 19:41:55 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 24 21:41:54 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OzE9Z-000299-7I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 21:41:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34030 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OzE9Y-0000SZ-GX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 15:41:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33782 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OzE9K-0000OO-PR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 15:41:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OzE9G-0004dz-Q7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 15:41:38 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:58681) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OzE9G-0004de-Ko for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 15:41:34 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OzE9F-0001sp-6V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 21:41:33 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no ([84.215.34.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 21:41:33 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 21:41:33 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 11 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAFVBMVEXZz8utoaJvZWRGPTui l5giGxqRh4jjC5C/AAACb0lEQVQ4jVXTvXLjIBAA4MXjSy0Uxr0XSX0gqLYcogcQQ28hzPs/wu0i +ZJjnMafl/0j0MjjXLR1Jgzel1IQC0xSsgmpg9U2huz9TFTA+6kGvEfrIp1F1Zh/oGLEyBImWQX2 31OAcYEjQpaqgt+hD3R/jego5AfoJhdtjSgHvG6KLmj6iyHl3/Cke8K2WDql/AZHYPSIw4AZa1nw ShHCorsi13lOE/e4Q0tgjV5v0KiS8k/EFyVF1BMAnOet+4FnjAYHXHlmbRo9SR2JoiYI0lWuUrwX c4CXF4LFzPeHeAixDTsoz7ldsMOKD7gJtaGZuCq/9x1tp/AGYr5r/bpKym/eA26pgTdtNNrsyw5U FCcHDwJ7RNsxTLSQnvozQ4YWYMak7fXVeU/9mQbgQg2KZMxwQEsLCuMLNlxK3uG9ToogMTwx8EwY vrVzmkBUeFVFoJ+9s+YBbxWsNt2R4/PpemNWKqlG6DHvoD7oiVgkqMfaYVZ+JmhXGyj5C5zFnHeY bTDW3ECtmaZFK+P3y3DXzrhlgnaikk8xDGUvl8BaFyYQN7rpT7B4URVUro/weqRYjrFTuVuFUfL3 J3rcWu45JNL+aO4rZQBqNejrDvfEOaLpGGiVAT8ZJtkWerE6mkwgCBZaVIULR1DF3CFDsHVW3l+4 XPowvPEGnN9BzY5Ghcj1nun/xNibFAWyl20fDOqBcyiqvO7sBLTG9csgbgNfJTUN9PNMyaCUTJ5O eeaByGSjHu/c6pAe5C10E9ANTZusXgV3lAcpANpmbipcUBsl6tSEPDdwlvwjkEKlEVsp4NepIsS6 +vX/ryvQm5NQF/AXyDvPSRzF/6oAAAAASUVORK5CYII= Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Marianne Faithfull's _Dangerous Acquaintances_: "Truth, Bitter Truth" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:DnXfU+7FxiCbe9z5r8VBRmofrLk= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130802 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Is this really a good idea? There's no chance the number of lines in > a frame will overflow a 32-bit int any time soon. SO I think an > explicit cast to int is a better solution here. That was my first impulse, too, but the other int casting got negative feedback.. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen