From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How does the Emacs bug tracker work? Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 13:48:56 +0200 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: <87zkkzfiz5.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87vcvm24ol.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309521727 19214 80.91.229.12 (1 Jul 2011 12:02:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 12:02:07 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 01 14:02:03 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QccQ5-0003bD-4y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 14:02:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60262 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QccQ3-0005i6-Ai for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 08:01:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38951) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QccDj-0002XF-0v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 07:49:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QccDf-0000fB-U1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 07:49:14 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:57200) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QccDf-0000ee-57 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 07:49:11 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QccDd-00064v-K8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 13:49:09 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 13:49:09 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 13:49:09 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAFVBMVEUGBAlWUlcTERULCQ3O zM4JBwwMCg63evNnAAACUklEQVQ4jWVTy5LjIAzk4g+A0foO4+W8GwruuKicXUOR8w4k+v9P2Jad ZF7Ko7BaQq2WrC7edbebdVYb9zA1VebufhirqdXAOP3uzj/dnlm1FhLjdOOOzyN+B+qlI2K3+52+ A4i1Xdzl7n8A7J1KgfsQ77fqKgTmFmBUYFlu6Q/gNi6cGACVzMLhDgzQgh0ZzP4BpDujB3DnoOQ0 0peMvcoHsDwzdoqKxxBOMQz+sL4XD7EKICx4PBEl/thC3DX7ML9nwBk4fgH6AeCPR3jPn+qAVQg1 QpdwMtpz+gQcFUcyWZdD/wBlVYIbCT7Zkp1Fys5egJBGrS2cREJ376olAWqLrSa7kC5a21cBsAbC qoHulchbS2aZwTKGBqBJApGeeclLpsUckaq2GuPfoss522IsdByCVAWV6kmXlUxZl3O3M2WRoolW bzrnfC3lXHKn90y/mgBYxLfsZEo0U3GELo1orWI8WQp2zXY5a+tdMcXQS0iocSXNOiPljDYMhuit GVWxLkSzuHGRJq9JuxNS1LA4rstKblkRrzWUWfTtgvVZsAYHKw1RikY7BjVS6FcEGSrkjO9mQRK/ xoQtSd1TZtJXwJ7B12ILksJqYNlWvualGJ3l6zEFFkk4vRu9t6jhn92+MQrS1hqkddyh8drOxyqp XePAdqW8vFj7UvcxHMAmB9d1mUmLsHHD9FTdmpomPL5lysY12coJs1WisFIb3nd30mYvqPCLqm3q YZv7J2Gb2kcbtyfS/iAMT5NsPwD13VptaajwA5gwVr6pnwn/BNv+Ay1JBWSyCtYgAAAAAElFTkSu QmCC Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Various's _The Wire Tapper 23_: "Julia Wolfe - LAD: Part 2 (edit)" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Y+pjlS4LDBlvtEqlsh5wji7kOAg= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:141353 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero writes: > I would really like something that brought to attention stagnated bug > reports. There are 2600 bug reports, of which at around 1500 (I think) are "normal" and stagnant. So sending reports about this stuff until it's been cleaned up is pretty useless, I think. I've started doing my part. 5 closed reports per day or bust! :-) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/