From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2176: 2176 proposal Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:40:37 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1334148155 30608 80.91.229.3 (11 Apr 2012 12:42:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:42:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 2176@debbugs.gnu.org To: Zachary Kanfer Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 11 14:42:32 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SHwsT-0007wW-EG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:42:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51052 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHwsS-0004zA-QJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:42:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49011) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHws6-000402-HZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:42:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHws0-0007ej-7c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:42:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54098) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHws0-0007ef-3w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:41:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHwt4-0001XQ-8g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:43:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 2176 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 2176-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B2176.13341481225834 (code B ref 2176); Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:43:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2176) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Apr 2012 12:42:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50636 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHws3-0001Vt-P7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:42:01 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:45594) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHwry-0001Vj-K1 for 2176@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:41:55 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHwqk-0002Ud-8c; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:40:38 +0200 X-Now-Playing: Zazou, Bikaye & Cy1's _Noir et Blanc_: "Keba" In-Reply-To: (Zachary Kanfer's message of "Thu, 28 Jul 2011 01:59:32 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130004 (Ma Gnus v0.4) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1SHwqk-0002Ud-8c MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1334752838.33044@L8ddi388VGOwl/b+EQP3Zg X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:58793 Archived-At: Zachary Kanfer writes: > What do you think of the effects of this patch? The patch included just seems to remove the entire warning? > Do we also want "Meta-x" instead of "M-x", to make it easier for such users, > even though the usage is different from almost everywhere else in Emacs? I'd say `M-x' instead of `Meta-x'. > -Zachary Kanfer > > === modified file 'lisp/startup.el' > *** lisp/startup.el 2011-07-14 12:57:06 +0000 > --- lisp/startup.el 2011-07-28 05:56:34 +0000 > *************** a face or button specification." > *** 1574,1586 **** > auto-save-list-file-prefix))) > t) > (fancy-splash-insert :face '(variable-pitch font-lock-comment-face) > ! "\nIf an Emacs session crashed recently, " > ! "type " > ! :face '(fixed-pitch font-lock-comment-face) > ! "Meta-x recover-session RET" > :face '(variable-pitch font-lock-comment-face) > ! "\nto recover" > ! " the files you were editing.")) > > (when concise > (fancy-splash-insert > --- 1574,1587 ---- > auto-save-list-file-prefix))) > t) > -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/