From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Thinking about changed buffers Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 22:22:49 +0200 Message-ID: References: <56F9911D.8040809@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1459196599 2235 80.91.229.3 (28 Mar 2016 20:23:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 20:23:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cl=E9ment?= Pit--Claudel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 28 22:23:03 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1akdgj-0002E7-UU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 22:23:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42672 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1akdgj-00073W-4W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:23:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46085) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1akdgf-00073G-Ui for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:22:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1akdga-00084r-SO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:22:57 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:45006) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1akdga-00084n-Ln for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:22:52 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.1.64.getinternet.no ([84.215.1.64] helo=stories) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1akdgY-0004yT-9e; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 22:22:52 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAFVBMVEVuqebo9PkjQYcXLWcP GkFTg742XKDF46dxAAACTklEQVQ4jV2TwXLiMAyG5V3Ss02bnLcOzXkbezh3G8M5LthnYrDe/xFW chLKrmYcJvrQbymSANgEwPkYAAKOUH3Ctwm4fqpiVb7BI8ibaQZqe5SPQB4WvzrLB/AkNmLxN39U M67+alIfa8COTlxBVGINeH6nh7ysAc37GjDn1iw3KLv6X+bcSgji9HIPWHN7ygGcE5+r/57b1jlS utdW33NTrJW/a7v7VUU5Of9d290orx8fEuYXK5RQclEd6fL/bHgpP3AMIccxYnKIGNhqOuMbOGOt m4yxbjCzXfkxQHmdyG9WO9HRO9gnrbXXttc6YdIdYkOamIAcWk/toFfrtnTwChynJ9f/A3R3gyI7 0U3tI6A7CnjlR7+gBXBW9r2AxHqm37J6WwDXYUyXKEPiz0WEgRsKwLT/0u0DsA78+HS61OJS+xHG RrIuXe6OSsj656Qkf1whpWiN2UNr3V6KRp48AUGglorAAc7OGTE9q+RBCWCwZakP2DjTC9Eo9Ln2 BKKsWeoXWOeOUtSCQJGKUvrW2BEO1DPlR48elSelSAlQbwDGXemn4k/d5qgR89UMBxqfM4N9hTkk HKtIf4jW/ebR5QDgZus+B6RO5ZMrK0LX8/DWaMxb5BZi0GWob3QDGSZj8gxyxFDm6pVnD68FaO54 uDnWSrwSHSkVwCgEnuqKh/eLlQxi6SEB3sMLLwTNhTU9Yr9EBN40EiIXJbeAjmoKvMtK3RCvlMRx BroAFtrsEVuufwVEeDe2AxaloYtpAVjADrlKAjmc+sQVUshfb/DJW4AXykwAAAAASUVORK5CYII= In-Reply-To: <56F9911D.8040809@gmail.com> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Cl=E9ment?= Pit--Claudel"'s message of "Mon, 28 Mar 2016 22:16:29 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:202361 Archived-At: Cl=E9ment Pit--Claudel writes: > Alternatively, introduce a threshold above which that hash-based check > does not happen, and instead fall back to the old, less complex > behaviour in that case. That's indeed a possibility. We already disable other CPU intensive operations in huge buffers... --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no