From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Benjamin Riefenstahl Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Editing email replies Date: 07 Sep 2002 19:19:12 +0200 Organization: None Sender: help-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1031454973 10069 127.0.0.1 (8 Sep 2002 03:16:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 03:16:13 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17nsYU-0002c8-00 for ; Sun, 08 Sep 2002 05:16:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17nsYT-0005JQ-00; Sat, 07 Sep 2002 23:16:09 -0400 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!nntp.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!news-out.cwix.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!newsfeed.nyc.globix.net!news-out.nuthinbutnews.com!propagator2-sterling!news-in-sterling.newsfeed.com!news-in.nuthinbutnews.com!feed.textport.net!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!news.supernews.com!benny-ppc.benny.crocodial.de!nobody Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Original-Lines: 18 Original-Xref: nntp.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:104581 Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:1138 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:1138 Hi Peter, Peter Davis writes: > Well, I know I'm probably in a minority here, but I actually think > HTML e-mail is a pretty good idea. You can get much more readable, > and more *meaningful* content with HTML. Shouldn't that read "more meaningful form"? HTML does nothing about the content as far as I see. One could say that exactly because people should look at their content, they should not distract themself and their readers with extraneous form elements. In my experience HTML is very, very rarely an improvement in email (or Usenet) messages. so long, benny