From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: assertion fails Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:14:59 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20050301.181731.207597655.Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1109805111 31679 80.91.229.2 (2 Mar 2005 23:11:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 23:11:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 03 00:11:51 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D6d0L-00088j-Pz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:11:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D6dJC-0003Fs-Ci for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 18:31:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D6dIQ-00033V-FC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 18:30:26 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D6dIK-00030y-Hk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 18:30:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D6dIK-00030h-D0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 18:30:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.237] (helo=pfepc.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D6d3W-0000WW-17 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 18:15:02 -0500 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (0x503e2644.bynxx3.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.62.38.68]) by pfepc.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id AF269262838; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 00:14:52 +0100 (CET) Original-To: Tak Ota In-Reply-To: <20050301.181731.207597655.Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com> (Tak Ota's message of "Tue, 01 Mar 2005 18:17:31 -0800 (PST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:34106 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:34106 Tak Ota writes: > Sat, 26 Feb 2005 15:19:03 -0800: wrote: > >> Tak Ota writes: >> >> > Hi Kim, >> > >> > Sorry I neglected having my homework done before reporting the >> > incident. Now I've narrowed it to a specific case. Here is the >> > recipe. Hi Tak, I will take a look at the data later, but for the moment I have disabled the xasserts, so can you test this again and see if there are any _visible_ effects (such as truncated or mis-aligned glyphs) caused by the problematic state detected by that assert. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk