From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:55:07 +0100 Message-ID: References: <83bp5te3s8.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1289998526 27958 80.91.229.12 (17 Nov 2010 12:55:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 12:55:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Kenichi Handa To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 17 13:55:22 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PIhXl-0007Nl-Sa for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:55:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40366 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PIhXl-0005DI-DY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 07:55:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44602 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PIhXe-0005D7-MK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 07:55:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PIhXd-00085I-Id for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 07:55:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:38117) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PIhXb-00083l-Vf; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 07:55:12 -0500 Original-Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67FE61C08E0F; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:55:08 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from hase (ppp-88-217-125-202.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.125.202]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8BCD1C002E5; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:55:07 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: Concentrate on th'cute, li'l CARTOON GUYS! Remember the SERIAL NUMBERS!! Follow the WHIPPLE AVE EXIT!! Have a FREE PEPSI!! Turn LEFT at th'HOLIDAY INN!! JOIN the CREDIT WORLD!! MAKE me an OFFER!!! In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 17 Nov 2010 07:26:15 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:132781 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Kenichi Handa >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, jasonr@gnu.org >> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 12:57:27 +0900 >> >> > . changed TTY display top enclose U+nnnn and "empty box" displays in >> > "[]", to simulate a box and make the display easier to read. >> >> For U+NNNN, I decided not to use "[]" because it takes too >> many columns. I thought underline or some background color >> (customizable through a face) was enough. Don't you think 8 >> columns (instead of 6 columns) is annoying? > > It is annoying allright, but [U+1234][U+5678] is more readable than > U+1234U+5678. However, if others disagree, I can change that back. \u1234\u5678 is even better. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."