From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:52:41 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4E6C80BF.2060002@gmx.at> <4E6DCB0A.4060605@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1315846675 10455 80.91.229.12 (12 Sep 2011 16:57:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 16:57:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andy Moreton , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 12 18:57:51 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R39pO-00047t-Vh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:57:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35905 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R39pO-0006W4-M6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:57:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48891) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R39pL-0006VW-Rr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:57:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R39pK-0007oQ-N7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:57:47 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:56321) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R39pK-0007oJ-Gt; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:57:46 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R39pC-0006rU-LS; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:57:38 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 12 Sep 2011 09:39:28 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAGFBMVEX+7eIAFC48WXLn0MSo k4z96d395tkTL0hWEh8oAAACE0lEQVQ4jW2TMW/jMAyFCRTK7i6eKwiXtahd/wBLyK3GJdQcIJZ2 Z9Hf7yMlJw1w8hDlfXwkLYvEi8l1JZaHib6stYGwUoRcNaKF3qws3XPMyfCykK5/T2BiYuKmv82i O9kyS7Q88kd1O2smw5wWw7pfVbebBpFB8FUc5lwNpRNg8LSAph+7CpinRQPo0hJVwDF4BYt5GKrj 3ACfd0MvgPMKgI5jHB+GTlo5hHDCq1DVy7YpYDYRACcVs9vDK6CLgJzjOteGsDaAyCNAxgl/PXRx IDIIyHkE+OjQ0A5uDdjfBgFrBeuL3tGURwW3+dmR5KMwBQXjq6GnECp4MXTdewNewPYf4Pyr3t0b CDA81bL1dgdHebcWXPSWNL2UPVPvgnXhRE70v6W0JOVu8U5DztVhm94jyVBvcgVHydNrbl/1qGA+ 7uHBT/nhcLuhPPLkpKmqoQC4SbTdMUvpd3tEQ1KAIz5mkhpi6PXeiCEzg2UGkEO6Q/ZagI1kQw0v BmnUt+QpJtnRDIPEO6kaK9CuUBnxAQehDkwX66TShxQOKcdFRi4xNigdmaSw+04ymjK8MR/wk82V OumedWQlR0ya8nshHP8nZk0m8+LD1zwGiyvgJ7InjD4CYbnIuY31y010ui7o7oAMV32N2y0MfhhO 5JmSWTAd2meOM2zO2T84kk8dc5lZYzINwzoO4pDbRnXafy/+ASB28pZ1WOYPAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Flower Corsano Duo's _The Four Aims_: "Three Degrees of Temptation" X-MailScanner-ID: 1R39pC-0006rU-LS MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1316451459.24584@Hqw+OKyfxWd9HyBnlw9uSw X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:143941 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > There's a certain conflict here between two groups of users: those who > set pop-up-frames non-nil, and those who don't. The former want the > current default, while most of the latter I suspect would want the > previous behavior, maybe out of habit, maybe for some other reason. I think that's a good analysis of the situation. I have `pop-up-frames' nil, and I just create two frames at startup. I never add or delete any frames. Having the second frame disappear, seemingly at random, puts a serious crimp in my work flow. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/