From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2179: 23.0.60; define-key vs define-key-after key syntax Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 21:16:34 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4987F2D6.2010900@math.utexas.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1317928683 7848 80.91.229.12 (6 Oct 2011 19:18:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:18:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 2179@debbugs.gnu.org, Gerard Brunick , Andreas Schwab To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 06 21:17:58 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBtS9-0006VW-Rq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 21:17:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39519 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBtS9-0000xS-BC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 15:17:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43609) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBtS5-0000uM-9r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 15:17:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBtS4-0004XC-1s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 15:17:53 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55953) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBtS3-0004X8-UH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 15:17:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBtSD-0001ja-Uj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 15:18:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 19:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 2179 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 2179-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B2179.13179286456597 (code B ref 2179); Thu, 06 Oct 2011 19:18:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Oct 2011 19:17:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBtRd-0001iM-3m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 15:17:25 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBtRW-0001hq-Ro for 2179@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 15:17:21 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RBtRF-00087T-EG; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 21:17:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Wed, 05 Oct 2011 01:08:13 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-Now-Playing: Zola Jesus's _Conatus_: "Shivers" X-MailScanner-ID: 1RBtRF-00087T-EG MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1318533422.1253@ElR68jhBDQ47V2c8n1lKMA X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 15:18:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:52307 Archived-At: Glenn Morris writes: > Perhaps the point was supposed to be that the order of the elements in a > keymap ONLY matters in a menu, therefore there is no point to use > define-key-after with anything other then menu entries, therefore > define-key-after does not need to be extended to handle the same range > of key syntax that define-key can, therefore this is just a > documentation bug for define-key-after. I totally misunderstood what the function was meant to do. :-) I've now just clarified the doc string and am closing the report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/