From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GnuTLS for W32 Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:51:28 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87aa68dfao.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ty4fbje8.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83ehvjs8t5.fsf@gnu.org> <87pqf3bcom.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83boqns68o.fsf@gnu.org> <87liprazr1.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83wr9bqez3.fsf@gnu.org> <87y5tr9dwv.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1325620319 32344 80.91.229.12 (3 Jan 2012 19:51:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 19:51:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 03 20:51:51 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RiAOl-0004le-No for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:51:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38913 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RiAOl-00011a-BM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:51:51 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59740) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RiAOc-0000Za-0x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:51:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RiAOa-0001RX-0w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:51:41 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:48988) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RiAOZ-0001RA-Rx; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:51:39 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RiAOT-0001bM-Vt; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:51:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 02 Jan 2012 03:47:03 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEW2tbwYFxpNTFFua3Gj oacjIiWLiI7b2+MIBwkzMjbVxXvuAAACaUlEQVQ4jU2UsWulQBDGp5BYbyH42hUObF0Q0gm3mNqA ELuQXba2CFh7EPDKZxBu/9v7Zlbf3fCa+Ms33+7szNA6qBERrzj4r3EYaJNQQo9Rqe0MAepeHJdg KC/wO8YiNnujJeo4qDKBX8aGEHrb/TTGNCCjOhVH1FVVGWfaRCZVlqLQ+sNobUzgcEbH4WtQksq5 0FT83dreG6MP+Ky0qSnuGt+dCd7aLkBd31VJ2zhFJGpZ4IlscLA5CkVrAYEA2z0RZb2AcaB1jOLs vCXqWGIaARtABdBafO1mSNj+gAIWBplafF/yBRLHYKR1r+M3W3S0LPlsbeYkF60x7t+4hO9yBpkl 5KpjQev3s/7BAIIFmTIrgFNpXbXBC8hhIrmg+ErXa33OinyZMwYHg73iU1kBCAH1DeYAzncXmDPq ufZ8Kihs6C4FUf/xqic2r9gjvPwD7lUUfPHev9MD2NDUBSkBre/ozJUx+PPFx8WDo4TzBfCOH3cu idb/g/np3fYuigfn8t2SnzXxfXAxouz6JiBPVyfy9gT3nW9+gdmGPph48EO9ioLEBIV3ITQRL3jT UsWOPgHml+XToVFG7pJUdysKgDm0phkAcENI0DzUCZAXBNjWifsKXUgZXgPH5f5RDKSxQpJkAK6p I4ONWxHu3qIRLH6ujgd3+1ZM3HLS6xYRAMaSgZrOXD0GC/VoNA8Vg0dbS3C7yeCUGOWoa07mLpAU KyRSYofexhjqmBQ8/dPOyVLwdKgyLQA+GJOm4mmHtXpbE1CjkLQCkOihgM3IPvz/uF25nrskbZnp Wj9pM7w9CERHxA5KG+gv4DRspt3iPacAAAAASUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: Kate Bush's _50 Words For Snow_: "Snowflake" X-MailScanner-ID: 1RiAOT-0001bM-Vt MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1326225094.07497@qmZMX3EFLQb5ss/6gpoarA X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:147237 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Why are we talking only about Windows? Do packages of Emacs 24 > development snapshots on GNU/Linux come with GnuTLS in the same > package? If they do, then I agree that the Windows binaries should > also include GnuTLS; but if not, I don't see why Windows should be > special in this regard. We don't want to confuse users by providing > functionality only on some platforms. And since the (major) binary GNU/Linux distributions will be providing the gnutls libraries with Emacs, then we should, too? :-) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/