From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The netsec thread Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 15:00:12 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1532091545 30666 195.159.176.226 (20 Jul 2018 12:59:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 12:59:05 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Emacs-Devel devel To: Jimmy Yuen Ho Wong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 20 14:59:01 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fgUzs-0007qN-Og for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 14:59:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48081 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgV1z-0006M3-JC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 09:01:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55997) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgV1E-0005zm-C3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 09:00:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgV18-0008EH-J1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 09:00:24 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:55969) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgV18-0008AD-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 09:00:18 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.221.165.getinternet.no ([84.212.221.165] helo=stories) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fgV12-0001HE-Mg; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 15:00:14 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAD1BMVEUNBQQRCAcaDAs5FxV+ TUSohQhOAAACRklEQVQ4jVVUgZHbMAyjnAUk5geIyAzwFjVAa2n/mQrQzV/r+/g+hAiQIBUp1s3C rOFRvlotVVqTZr0BGR2hrsRra6WZVMVXj9GqlDuhaW+aQDP3LiJFeFZBq01FtHePMJGE6mHWtdcm EAFTxDeiBQk4k0XgmMaYey0zFFNshuE8qeSI84mU4eNlzcNQYGqATKniY3RTH6lxAx49JlIsWzLv JCXVXMP3nuEolB0ijkpEHmuFQx5sxsOItgTescMSAFsvdjcBeM9lIwgMNm2suxQyzStibiaMG+jZ IJlmLDIhBSVbdigyAVzyxXgY/tgHOkyJ+bs8ghr+/RwW/Wi9yWPPPX+VB0VsSLmcAKigveclAGac ZyskPPoNrAlxlLtPZIDR9EUg5mJNSIjT2xOlj/aqBDbYMRG+FbZwUpXAQogm7ulxqlGjlVoJgAs1 TceuFIPF/VAAz02uCSUsy2iaQJWafYDe9yhYEM4JnVd4+EwA4qOUBCxeyml8QZY97PUiMBLDJskb 7SWwsarmH6AKSqI6gYw60+jVXIxmVarJhA+nfksgbd3K2C//CyDmOT3TXGNOEACcxTNjxN0FhnKP FiWRbYNt2EUEALZeYHkieIPcT00TkYFy9ufBfxcvSK6P738ezLH4DwAS2LVRJmSukvsGFx2e52kf qM2vvLm4IMIRbWzKgmkR7865ytFV0ifm0OAZ/f4RgCt39PNcI2/m/wD5AhcN8f4DoMtJDU6cCZrA SoMnbwIuZssrYnLT0MiF/Tk7NNLNP91brLIkzdkrAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC In-Reply-To: (Jimmy Yuen Ho Wong's message of "Fri, 20 Jul 2018 13:55:01 +0100") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:227581 Archived-At: Jimmy Yuen Ho Wong writes: > Woooo I like this bikeshedding :) Thanks in advance for checking out > the netsec branch. Just a heads up tho, I plan to push my OCSP stuff > this weekend, let me know if you prefer me doing it before or after > your review. Just go ahead with your work; there's no need to synchronise with me. :-) > Abobut the issued to and issued by, there are a couple of reasons I > just dumped out the the whole DN, mainly because of DV, OV and EV > certs put different and sometime irrelevent things in the RDNs. But > obvious, current iteration isn't ideal either. Perhaps I should sort > the RDNs, and always outpunt CN=...O=...OU=.... in that order, and > properly wrap them. Well, I think that most of those data points are of virtually no interest to the end user, so they shouldn't be displayed at all (in the non-detailed view). I.e., I think the way the current NSM displays those data points is fine. (But then I would, wouldn't I? :-)) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no