From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Building Emacs overflowed pure space Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 00:47:30 +0200 Message-ID: References: <7dbe73ed0607180138x35e9d9bft3e42f20cb369795c@mail.gmail.com> <200607181929.k6IJTZN9028639@jane.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1153349381 9501 80.91.229.2 (19 Jul 2006 22:49:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 22:49:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mathias.dahl@gmail.com, teirllm@dms.auburn.edu, ralphm@members.fsf.org, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 20 00:49:39 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G3KrF-0006oo-Vd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 00:49:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G3KrF-0003hR-Ff for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:49:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G3Kr3-0003hC-8m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:49:21 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G3Kr1-0003h0-OW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:49:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G3Kr1-0003gx-IK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:49:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.237] (helo=pfepc.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G3Kr2-00064K-3H; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:49:20 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (0x503e2644.bynxx3.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.62.38.68]) by pfepc.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id D7FA88A001C; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 00:49:12 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:15:53 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:57356 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > I see no good reason why each expansion of `dolist' should use a > different symbol. Maybe we can arrange to use one symbol over and > over again. Does this work? Does that really work with nested dolist calls? -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk