From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:26:31 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4E6C80BF.2060002@gmx.at> <4E6FA0DE.9070001@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1315945806 5466 80.91.229.12 (13 Sep 2011 20:30:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:30:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 13 22:29:58 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R3ZcD-000880-Bs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:29:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49545 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R3ZcC-0006C6-DM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:29:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34480) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R3Zc9-0006Bx-A9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:29:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R3Zc8-0002be-2i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:29:53 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:34838) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R3Zc7-0002aJ-Rp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:29:52 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R3Zbt-0002R6-Pw; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:29:37 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4E6FA0DE.9070001@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:28:46 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAGFBMVEX304U4FQ+3hTz++LaO YCz+7qnhtWXNnE2Ow0/tAAACUUlEQVQ4jWWUzY/bIBDFURqzZ1epeu6UhmskRHrtUrq5RrHYvVre FF8jNoV/v2/A+9XOkZ/fmw8Yi96ViBiHYecfDUe4yfG2F7333pGnS3fqfwXEUSR3WACVRFtx6j/x sRBnf/AAG085zkmLdf851ki+KVyOMs50278LBlEIfPYv2PjDKMQYp/+BhkKIm3juP1IphYi8qzm2 UUIxd/etXETJnhVZZiSZfjcwoMMG3GXOMeapKgzOzUyygpzlHOPUvSjS3QJinMe4YjBYa4xN7kY1 IOdLSz6YAYpJrRaFmC8yBoA6XXN/ZdC7PKJxSaHmYGCnlWIQRxmlPLwq7Mxgc0DjUsq7sIfC1pua VwSAichUxLYqbKiKiUHm4Y5dMPtmZY2NSS1AiC4M+/7nkiPTtRcuC4xdhhcFwFY3wFYYBgM7VHCA FbGTHAfzplxyAK4BKABse1jKw4oytzGG4Y3iWsGWc4sQbB1iBWuXYKV5VOMQXhXmRBV0Mt7Dyrwo zKlwufSIItFgTV5vEEA1YMyugaHOKpyS2gjnnhiMod1HBWtigLI+GAvw0N7VK9D8wnP3DLAKC6CS 8xzfACiogYIX9AyO81yKTiS8Il23UFRwlDhHJIEF1FWSJ4CjkGUBsEoM4OB/8KDbJrACCAE7PiAH oElfhVMey0xlO+xKWfzBFaxcYrc/ZocK+JxzpltMF1yn8s0+g5J0GyIINF/NnkFmu0TKC2KAhp7M d9SWm4aB07pW1ZkH5bns2rf3ohWrVBfOPf8++NeCbe4XQK47fnn3A/gL2yIRv1zQ8kUAAAAASUVO RK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: Kate Bush's _Aerial (2)_: "Somewhere in Between" X-MailScanner-ID: 1R3Zbt-0002R6-Pw MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1316550577.91137@YdTnDsj4BMI37xajJC7Ayg X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:143997 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: >> Killing a buffer has never deleted a frame before. > > It should behave now as before. Please check. I haven't had any frames disappearing suddenly on me the last hour, so I think this is probably fixed now. Thanks. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/