From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22819: 25.0.91; Don't try to indent region if the buffer is read-only Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 16:33:06 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87vam26amc.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83lgmywlo4.fsf@gnu.org> <83y3qtswvv.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="16147"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 22819@debbugs.gnu.org, Kaushal Modi , npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 25 16:34:43 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hfmWw-00045k-PY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 16:34:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60928 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfmWv-0005sD-Bl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:34:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46640) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfmWL-0005qp-D5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:34:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hfmWK-0003SX-BO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:34:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47856) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hfmWH-0003QR-OE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:34:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfmWH-0002rs-Ka for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:34:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 14:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22819 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 22819-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22819.156147319210955 (code B ref 22819); Tue, 25 Jun 2019 14:34:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22819) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2019 14:33:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33164 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfmVU-0002qd-J6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:33:12 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:50608) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfmVR-0002qS-JU for 22819@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:33:11 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hfmVO-0000xE-8d; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 16:33:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83y3qtswvv.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 08 Aug 2017 22:05:40 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:161372 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Kaushal Modi >> Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 13:06:52 +0000 >> Cc: 22819@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> @Eli: Based on the discussion[1] on emacs-devel, there isn't any >> opposition to doing what's proposed in this >> bug thread. So if it's alright by you, and if there is no strong >> reason to use the more concise alternative i.e. if >> both barf-if-buffer-read-only and interactive "*.." are equally >> correct, can the former approach be committed? > > I'm not sure what is it that you are asking me. You already know my > opinion on this proposal, and it hasn't changed. I think the rough consensus was that adding this special-casing to this command wasn't idea, so I'm closing this bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no