From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What is normal these days (display.texi)? Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:05:29 +0200 Message-ID: References: <85zmflu62p.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85lkr5qusn.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <853bd9on2x.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85veq5lnrn.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1152533414 10221 80.91.229.2 (10 Jul 2006 12:10:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:10:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 10 14:10:12 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FzuaY-0006my-DX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:10:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FzuaX-0004ob-SI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 08:10:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FzuYT-000359-NE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 08:08:01 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FzuYP-00030K-VE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 08:08:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FzuYP-0002zx-Ji for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 08:07:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.235] (helo=pfepa.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FzuZD-0006rn-Aj; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 08:08:47 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (unknown [80.165.4.124]) by pfepa.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 84832FAC02A; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:07:18 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: David Kastrup In-Reply-To: <85veq5lnrn.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:09:32 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:56884 Archived-At: David Kastrup writes: >> The name "force-window-update" (and the original text) >> indicate an immediate action. > > Uh, do you mean "the original text" proposed by me? I fail to guess > what version you are referring to now. I meant the original doc string for force-window-update. > Well, what would be? Is there any purpose, anyway, to have > posn-at-x-y work with an updated display matrix that has not even been > displayed? I was actually thinking about pos-visible-in-window-p. It may very well make sense to want to know whether point is visible in a window after some change. See line-move for an example. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk