Daiki Ueno <ueno@gnu.org> writes:

>> BTW, what happened with your earlier `make-process' suggestion?
>
> I'm still willing to work on that, but just wanted to be sure that my
> desired feature (additional pipes) could be implemented atop of it,

So here it is.  This merely adds a new function `make-process' as an
alternative form of `start-process', and use it in the `start-process'
implementation.  No extra feature has been added by now.

All tests succeeded with this, except file-notify-tests, which is
failing without the patch.  Reviews appreciated.

Thanks,
--
Daiki Ueno