From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: -Wall Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 20:22:32 +0200 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1459794187 29160 80.91.229.3 (4 Apr 2016 18:23:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 18:23:07 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 04 20:22:57 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1an99I-0002yG-8g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 20:22:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60447 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1an99H-0004fr-6C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 14:22:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53123) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1an99E-0004fm-7N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 14:22:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1an99A-0003Fe-6m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 14:22:48 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:39187) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1an999-0003FI-WA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 14:22:44 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1an996-0002u6-Hd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 20:22:40 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.1.64.getinternet.no ([84.215.1.64]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 20:22:40 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by cm-84.215.1.64.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 20:22:40 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.215.1.64.getinternet.no Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAFVBMVEVBLS3xwrCgcme+iHpc Q0EjFRZ8W1bWwY36AAACc0lEQVQ4jXWTwXLjIAyGtQ72OY5nck6xy7mBbM7UljmzrcnZa1O9/yOs wG263dlqEgf+T+KXgYCL4KxAS7GKUKGdiAR6R8AfGhGBwSi8LW2voISF0+NEoy/90glwY5jmQglI 1RSn+Hp1x55zkOaKprmax2kEsmJ8qOt6tqvBZZ7oBTB6K0CUMLBeN0z3NI/4a2ZHdi6HrOdohG3o YQ8lMjCm/ozjc3p2w5Fb+wLuwV2Z8//AU/kNqNV3wLyDJlrheHS4fQVdEBjRDl8Ad/Um2jy7DvXf 4HzqP3wOQ+eGO7hWd/9m0ZciDxI4te/pP+pubc7nO8gFB33zRX19qC+brhkU4ufj874odtEcwJl+ qc0GenjqVquGKq5Ka3eZ2qYxaal+fup3s0WAHbnO7cremAyoA8fnDyDW1ZgYTxXrkgEg8EmCaM/1 7+bkFHrmyQMJEd3CaTV/OyFCsQHqpZSL0cQ/hhsQ424DEqUx/rRjRPhIZbSF0clDKscJ86tuTQc2 hBjf2gwurUIXsVrrw6JGL+YYhwyu87IQv8VaH41GQIuukgpadgfhwILAKy0RUQh3Y8DG5sTXNgJi IfgS8nWbb5JAcolRlP4QrV412ZJvLSoGqURLfknebcpD64gSSCXpHFOC4omUiigy2EiX97TtVp0B fgBNawK6nfsEIgMFCxMdtxWVmqTkAoQYwotMq5vNClwuQChDuMkPI+5JpoIEQgiVTAsnlPVknYCH 6hS8/IxUwEcaACqukoo3qyvDIh9v5DAE8IBs47mHHCK88XbBBliH8E94Bsmm/JS2HFZZ9CU/WfBl ltLSKT0JICxPc6FHHnr4A6Hy1TBvDubcAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:WEf3o3mQO3OC1bVRo0Tzsy89C/Y= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:202697 Archived-At: There's a lot fewer warnings when compiling with -Wall in emacs/src now than there used to be, but there should be none, I think. Are there any of them that, like, are there for a reason (i.e., we disagree with the gcc people that those things should be warned about), or are they all things that should be fixed? If it's the latter, I think we should fix those, and have -Wall as a standard compilation switch. It's much easier to write cleanly C code with -Wall than without. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no