From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA>
Cc: 11474@debbugs.gnu.org, Scott Turner <srt19170@gmail.com>
Subject: bug#11474: Patch for Emacsclient --eval bug
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 17:29:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3imsr59oa.fsf@gnus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwv1txfokm0.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@gnu.org> (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 02 Apr 2014 10:57:56 -0400")
Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA> writes:
>> The patch provided below simply discards the Elisp arguments when
>> emacsclient falls through to the alternate editor. There may be better
>> fixes, but this does the least harm while retaining compatibility.
>
> Silently dropping arguments is not very polite, so I'm not really happy
> with your solution. I think the "right" behavior would be to call the
> alternate editor while preserving most arguments; IOW the right fix
> in this case would be to add a "--eval" argument, so that your
> alternate_editor can decide whether to drop args when it gets an
> "--eval" or to prepend all other args with a "--eval=" (or do whatever
> else it fancies).
Hm... I think I agree with the patch Scott posted, and not with this
solution. :-)
The use case here would be if you say something like
$ emacsclient -a nano --eval '(my-emacs-setup-thing)'
The eval bit is meaningful in Emacs, and may be something that the user
feels is something that Emacs should do when called from emacsclient.
But if there's no server, then we should use nano.
The current behaviour is to use nano with the file name
'(my-emacs-setup-thing)', while you propose to call nano with
--eval '(my-emacs-setup-thing)', which would be even worse, I think,
while just dropping the parameters completely in the -a case would make
this usable.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-27 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-15 5:27 bug#11474: 24.1.50; eval a command does the wrong thing with emacsclientw.exe Jason Lewis
2013-12-13 15:30 ` bug#11474: Patch for Emacsclient --eval bug Scott Turner
2013-12-24 14:56 ` Scott Turner
2013-12-24 16:03 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-12-24 16:11 ` Scott Turner
2014-04-02 14:57 ` Stefan Monnier
2014-04-02 15:34 ` Scott Turner
2014-04-02 16:34 ` Stefan Monnier
2019-06-27 15:29 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen [this message]
2019-06-27 18:17 ` Stefan Monnier
2019-06-27 18:40 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-06-27 18:56 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-06-27 19:00 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-06-27 19:14 ` Stefan Monnier
2019-06-27 19:19 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3imsr59oa.fsf@gnus.org \
--to=larsi@gnus.org \
--cc=11474@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA \
--cc=srt19170@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.